<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week fourteen recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2009/12/15/week-fourteen-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2009/12/15/week-fourteen-recap/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:54:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2009/12/15/week-fourteen-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=185#comment-331</guid>
		<description>Yes .. you need to be correct on both to advance.  What it means is that you&#039;d now have to pick 20 of the 32 teams to win a game correctly in order to be left standing after 17 weeks (3 weeks of double picks).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes .. you need to be correct on both to advance.  What it means is that you&#8217;d now have to pick 20 of the 32 teams to win a game correctly in order to be left standing after 17 weeks (3 weeks of double picks).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayton B</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2009/12/15/week-fourteen-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=185#comment-322</guid>
		<description>i like not having buybacks and increasing the fee. not increasing the entries allowed. but making multiple picks in the later weeks is very interesting. for that would you have to be correct on both picks to advance with that entry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like not having buybacks and increasing the fee. not increasing the entries allowed. but making multiple picks in the later weeks is very interesting. for that would you have to be correct on both picks to advance with that entry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2009/12/15/week-fourteen-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=185#comment-321</guid>
		<description>I meant on top of NOT having buybacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant on top of NOT having buybacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2009/12/15/week-fourteen-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=185#comment-320</guid>
		<description>one other way, on top of buybacks, that some pools help make sure there&#039;s a winner is to have players make multiple picks in certain weeks.  Usually late in the year .. like weeks 13, 14, 15 or something like that .. make 2 picks .. get both right to survive.

That&#039;ll get it down pretty quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one other way, on top of buybacks, that some pools help make sure there&#8217;s a winner is to have players make multiple picks in certain weeks.  Usually late in the year .. like weeks 13, 14, 15 or something like that .. make 2 picks .. get both right to survive.</p>
<p>That&#8217;ll get it down pretty quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe B</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2009/12/15/week-fourteen-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=185#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Sounds good, it should be a true survivor pool.  I&#039;m for increasing the entry fee and/or increasing the number of entries from 5 to 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good, it should be a true survivor pool.  I&#8217;m for increasing the entry fee and/or increasing the number of entries from 5 to 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny S.</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2009/12/15/week-fourteen-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenny S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=185#comment-315</guid>
		<description>That was my suggestion a few weeks back when all this buyback talk started. Increase the entry fee to $20 and you will have a pot close to what it was this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was my suggestion a few weeks back when all this buyback talk started. Increase the entry fee to $20 and you will have a pot close to what it was this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2009/12/15/week-fourteen-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=185#comment-314</guid>
		<description>My suggestion is to eliminate the buybacks and update the buy in price to $20 or $25 dollars per team.  I don&#039;t think for such a small increase you would lose that many participants and the pot would double.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My suggestion is to eliminate the buybacks and update the buy in price to $20 or $25 dollars per team.  I don&#8217;t think for such a small increase you would lose that many participants and the pot would double.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayton B</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2009/12/15/week-fourteen-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=185#comment-313</guid>
		<description>good to see you stand your ground. i could care less about buy backs. but do you think you might increase the entry fee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good to see you stand your ground. i could care less about buy backs. but do you think you might increase the entry fee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike P</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2009/12/15/week-fourteen-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=185#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Sounds good to me...It&#039;s your pool and you can make the rules.... I just appreciate you doing all this work.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good to me&#8230;It&#8217;s your pool and you can make the rules&#8230;. I just appreciate you doing all this work.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
