<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for NFL Survivor Pool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Final thoughts of 2009 and early look at 2010 by John Bejarano</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2010/01/04/final-thoughts-of-2009-and-early-look-at-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bejarano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=199#comment-415</guid>
		<description>I like Eric F.&#039;s suggestion the best.  No multi-pick weeks until Week 17, then on Week 17, you make your primary &quot;Week 17&quot; pick, pick another game as your 18th pick, pick another as your 19th pick, and so on for all the remaining games that week.  If that still comes out as a tie, we can live with it.  Will definitely be back next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Eric F.&#8217;s suggestion the best.  No multi-pick weeks until Week 17, then on Week 17, you make your primary &#8220;Week 17&#8243; pick, pick another game as your 18th pick, pick another as your 19th pick, and so on for all the remaining games that week.  If that still comes out as a tie, we can live with it.  Will definitely be back next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Final thoughts of 2009 and early look at 2010 by Graham P</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2010/01/04/final-thoughts-of-2009-and-early-look-at-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 03:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=199#comment-406</guid>
		<description>My 2 cents...Buy-backs should be kept in place if you are thinking of double pick weeks....with no double pick weeks,eliminate bb&#039;s.Not sure why it matters if poolies have more than 5 teams(?),after all, money is money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 2 cents&#8230;Buy-backs should be kept in place if you are thinking of double pick weeks&#8230;.with no double pick weeks,eliminate bb&#8217;s.Not sure why it matters if poolies have more than 5 teams(?),after all, money is money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Final thoughts of 2009 and early look at 2010 by Doctor K</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2010/01/04/final-thoughts-of-2009-and-early-look-at-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=199#comment-405</guid>
		<description>First, great job Bill!  Second, no double picks.  Third, keep Week 17 - that&#039;s part of the challenge in terms of picking winners - it&#039;s a major issue in fantasy but should not be in survivor.  Fourth, going to the playoffs is worthy of consideration to minimize multiple winners if the pool stays as big as it is.  Finally, GO COWBOYS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, great job Bill!  Second, no double picks.  Third, keep Week 17 &#8211; that&#8217;s part of the challenge in terms of picking winners &#8211; it&#8217;s a major issue in fantasy but should not be in survivor.  Fourth, going to the playoffs is worthy of consideration to minimize multiple winners if the pool stays as big as it is.  Finally, GO COWBOYS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Final thoughts of 2009 and early look at 2010 by Eric F</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2010/01/04/final-thoughts-of-2009-and-early-look-at-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=199#comment-404</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t necessarily like the double pick idea either, but if you are going to do it an idea may be to make the picks like a pick 17 and pick 18 in the last week - if tied after pick 17 go to pick 18, and so forth.However, I think if you make it all 17 weeks unscathed, you should just be happy with whatever money yu get - I am sure the 13 winners are pleased enough at the moment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t necessarily like the double pick idea either, but if you are going to do it an idea may be to make the picks like a pick 17 and pick 18 in the last week &#8211; if tied after pick 17 go to pick 18, and so forth.However, I think if you make it all 17 weeks unscathed, you should just be happy with whatever money yu get &#8211; I am sure the 13 winners are pleased enough at the moment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Final thoughts of 2009 and early look at 2010 by matt</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2010/01/04/final-thoughts-of-2009-and-early-look-at-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=199#comment-403</guid>
		<description>all of your idea&#039;s are great.  the non-conformists can go find another league.  to add a 4th option:  make week 17 have 1 pick, but also, pick all games, so if there is a tie, you can have whomever picks more correctly is the tie breaker baring their eliminator was picked correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all of your idea&#8217;s are great.  the non-conformists can go find another league.  to add a 4th option:  make week 17 have 1 pick, but also, pick all games, so if there is a tie, you can have whomever picks more correctly is the tie breaker baring their eliminator was picked correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Final thoughts of 2009 and early look at 2010 by Dennis E</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2010/01/04/final-thoughts-of-2009-and-early-look-at-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=199#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Make this a true survivor pool....No BUY BACKS or AUTO PICKS or the DOUBLE PICK idea...

Why are you trying to fix something when it doesn&#039;t need any fixing...

Stop treating everybody like babies, we don&#039;t need are hands held...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make this a true survivor pool&#8230;.No BUY BACKS or AUTO PICKS or the DOUBLE PICK idea&#8230;</p>
<p>Why are you trying to fix something when it doesn&#8217;t need any fixing&#8230;</p>
<p>Stop treating everybody like babies, we don&#8217;t need are hands held&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Final thoughts of 2009 and early look at 2010 by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2010/01/04/final-thoughts-of-2009-and-early-look-at-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=199#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Not in league, just found it.  I think we have a good rule on non-pick players.  &quot;If you fail to submit a pick by the Sunday deadline, then your selection will be made by default in the following order: 1. Home team on Monday game. 2. Road team on Monday game. 3. Alphabetical order of teams you have not selected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not in league, just found it.  I think we have a good rule on non-pick players.  &#8220;If you fail to submit a pick by the Sunday deadline, then your selection will be made by default in the following order: 1. Home team on Monday game. 2. Road team on Monday game. 3. Alphabetical order of teams you have not selected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Final thoughts of 2009 and early look at 2010 by Dennis P</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2010/01/04/final-thoughts-of-2009-and-early-look-at-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=199#comment-400</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of the responses - I am not a fan of the double picks.  It is very hard to get thru 17 weeks making one pick.  Eliminating buy backs is a good idea and so is the auto pick change.  I don&#039;t see the problem in splitting with 10-20 people at the end of the season.  Thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of the responses &#8211; I am not a fan of the double picks.  It is very hard to get thru 17 weeks making one pick.  Eliminating buy backs is a good idea and so is the auto pick change.  I don&#8217;t see the problem in splitting with 10-20 people at the end of the season.  Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Final thoughts of 2009 and early look at 2010 by Mike W</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2010/01/04/final-thoughts-of-2009-and-early-look-at-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=199#comment-399</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m fine with eliminating buybacks.  I don&#039;t like the double pick idea unless it is just for the final week of the season.  Just my two cents.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m fine with eliminating buybacks.  I don&#8217;t like the double pick idea unless it is just for the final week of the season.  Just my two cents.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Final thoughts of 2009 and early look at 2010 by Clayton B</title>
		<link>http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/2010/01/04/final-thoughts-of-2009-and-early-look-at-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zebrapool.com/blog/?p=199#comment-398</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m not so sure i like the &#039;double pick&#039; idea. maybe if it was just the final week. as far as everything else goes, it&#039;s cool. i REALLY like the idea of auto-picks going to non-favored teams. personally, i think if they can&#039;t get their picks in on time they should be eliminated. hell, the guy who was late this week still won with the Browns of all teams. anywayz, i had a blast and will definately be back next year. hopefully i&#039;ll bring a few more people into the fold to have some local competition. take care and i&#039;ll see ya in the fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m not so sure i like the &#8216;double pick&#8217; idea. maybe if it was just the final week. as far as everything else goes, it&#8217;s cool. i REALLY like the idea of auto-picks going to non-favored teams. personally, i think if they can&#8217;t get their picks in on time they should be eliminated. hell, the guy who was late this week still won with the Browns of all teams. anywayz, i had a blast and will definately be back next year. hopefully i&#8217;ll bring a few more people into the fold to have some local competition. take care and i&#8217;ll see ya in the fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
